Rapid Scaling for a European E‑commerce Product
+15 engineers requested in ≤12 weeks, across 9 parallel roles and a multi-team interview structure
Read More
Context & Key Conditions
The client is a European e‑commerce product with an aggressive roadmap: expanding the product catalog, integrating with payment/tax/logistics providers, improving front-end performance, and preparing for seasonal peak loads (e.g., Black Friday).
Polytech already had an integrated team of ~35 specialists on the account and received a request to add +15 engineers within ≤12 weeks.
Roles / stack: Senior & Middle Full-Stack .NET (React + .NET, Azure), Senior & Middle Back-End .NET, QA Automation, Manual QA, Performance Engineering
Engagement model: Fully remote (any location), contracted via Polytech under Ukrainian FOP model
Candidate requirements: E‑commerce domain experience, API & web services design/development, English for product and management communication
The Challenge
We needed to scale the team without impacting delivery, while dealing with:
- A multi-team client structure, meaning different interview streams and stakeholders
- 9 parallel roles with different expectations and leveling criteria
- Live interviews only (no take-home assignments), with decisions made in tight scheduling windows
- Final offer approvals on the client side, creating a high risk of candidate drop-off due to delays
Our Approach
We designed "hiring as a product": standardizing technical criteria and scorecards across all streams, running parallel pipelines under a single priority model, strengthening pre-screening on Polytech's side, and introducing rigorous operational discipline (SLAs, dashboards, WBR cadence).
Interview Framework (Single Consistent Backbone):
- Stages: Polytech screening → Polytech technical interview → Client technical interview → Client manager interview
- Principles: Live-only, fast decisions, transparent communication of expectations and next steps
- Risk management: Backup interview slots and asynchronous fallback options where feasible
Delivery Speed
starts within target window
Engineers onboarded and productive
weeks timeline
From kickoff to full team expansion
parallel roles
Across multiple teams simultaneously
What We Delivered
- Standardized operating model across 9 roles: competency matrices (QA / Back-End / Full-Stack / Performance), soft-skill expectations, and English proficiency requirements
- Parallel pipelines with centralized prioritization to avoid slot contention between teams
- Stronger Polytech technical screening: short technical quizzes + deep live sessions to reduce noise and increase signal
- Role/level routing: if a candidate didn't fit the initial role, we proactively proposed a relevant alternative role/level
- Cost-efficient sourcing: LinkedIn, referrals, EU/UA job boards; targeted use of Djinni for peak waves
- Transparency via ATS and dashboards: Zoho Recruit and an SLA for feedback in 2–72 hours
- Process cadence: daily reviews during the first three weeks, then a weekly business review (WBR) focused on conversions, bottlenecks, escalations, and cross-team priority balancing
- Sell calls with Tech Leads/CTO: clear explanation of stack, role impact, and roadmap to reduce drop-off
Results
We delivered 13 starts within ≤12 weeks by issuing 17 offers, with 13 candidates starting within the target window (two additional offers landed on the edge/outside the window due to notice periods and vacations).
Funnel & Metrics (Multi-stream hiring across 9 roles):
- Candidates processed: ~350 (excluding the initial screening outflow)
- Polytech technical interviews: 80 (18 QA, 29 Full-Stack, 26 Back-End .NET, 7 Performance)
- Submitted to the client for final stages: 38 candidates
- Speed-to-first-CV: first relevant profiles delivered within the first days after kickoff
Release cadence and defect rate did not degrade — delivery remained within existing SLAs. The client specifically highlighted the quality of Polytech's pre-screening, the transparency of the process, and the risk-managed execution of a high-velocity multi-stream hiring model.
Quality Outcomes
90-day retention
12 out of 13 continued past 90 days
candidates processed
Across all hiring streams
days to first PR
Median ramp-up time
Risk Management
Key Risks and How We Mitigated Them:
- Vacations / overloaded interview slots (Aug–Oct): tight slot booking, reserve windows, priority synchronization
- High competition for .NET talent in the EU: early sell calls, clear compensation bands, structured offer scenarios
- Infrastructure instability (connectivity/power): backup slots, fast rescheduling without "silent" periods
- Delays in client approvals: weekly escalations and regular touch-points with candidates to keep engagement high
Client Outcome:
- Rapid scaling without delivery degradation during a peak-ready period (Black Friday Peak)
- A controlled multi-stream hiring engine: 9 roles, multiple teams — one transparent process
- Higher pipeline quality due to strong pre-screening and signal-focused evaluation
- A repeatable model for future hiring waves: playbooks, metrics, and dashboards